[Common] Add light ion centrality tables with anchoring at 90%#16939
Open
jesgum wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
[Common] Add light ion centrality tables with anchoring at 90%#16939jesgum wants to merge 3 commits into
jesgum wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
changed the title
|
O2 linter results: ❌ 30 errors, |
jesgum
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 7, 2026 10:21
jesgum
requested review from
a team,
alibuild,
ddobrigk,
dsekihat,
iarsene,
jgrosseo,
ktf and
victor-gonzalez
as code owners
July 7, 2026 10:21
Collaborator
|
Error while checking build/O2Physics/code-check for 0d88c93 at 2026-07-19 23:25: Full log here. |
Collaborator
Collaborator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds two new centrality tables, specifically meant for cross checks for light ions.
The approach here is the same approach as in Pb--Pb, where we fit with Glauber+NBD, anchor at 90%, use data for 0-90% and Glauber+NBD for 90-100%. One table is added for a collision based calibration and one table for a bc based calibration.
Tagging @ddobrigk