Skip to content

[AutoPR azure-resourcemanager-containerservice]-generated-from-SDK Generation - Java-6394911#49376

Draft
azure-sdk wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sdkauto/azure-resourcemanager-containerservice-6394911
Draft

[AutoPR azure-resourcemanager-containerservice]-generated-from-SDK Generation - Java-6394911#49376
azure-sdk wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sdkauto/azure-resourcemanager-containerservice-6394911

Conversation

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Configurations: 'specification/containerservice/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/aks/tspconfig.yaml', SDK Release Type: beta, and CommitSHA: 'a6887d2260f26285d4b1f5fba97da370be9200b4' in SpecRepo: 'https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs' Pipeline run: https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=6394911 Refer to https://eng.ms/docs/products/azure-developer-experience/develop/sdk-release/sdk-release-prerequisites to prepare for SDK release. Release plan link: https://azsdk-releaseplan-dashboard-hveph5aqhhcfhtgu.westus-01.azurewebsites.net/?releaseplan=2267 Submitted by: fumingzhang@microsoft.com

…osoft.ContainerService/aks/tspconfig.yaml', SDK Release Type: beta, and CommitSHA: 'a6887d2260f26285d4b1f5fba97da370be9200b4' in SpecRepo: 'https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs' Pipeline run: https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=6394911 Refer to https://eng.ms/docs/products/azure-developer-experience/develop/sdk-release/sdk-release-prerequisites to prepare for SDK release.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 4, 2026 12:12
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. label Jun 4, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This AutoPR updates the azure-resourcemanager-containerservice management SDK’s TypeSpec input pin to a newer azure-rest-api-specs commit and bumps the library to a new beta version in preparation for a generated release.

Changes:

  • Updated the TypeSpec/specification commit pin in tsp-location.yaml.
  • Bumped the package version reference in README and the Maven artifact version to 2.62.0-beta.1.
  • Adjusted build/release metadata (revapi.skip) and finalized the changelog entry date for 2.62.0-beta.1.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
sdk/containerservice/azure-resourcemanager-containerservice/tsp-location.yaml Updates the pinned azure-rest-api-specs commit used for TypeSpec generation.
sdk/containerservice/azure-resourcemanager-containerservice/README.md Updates the dependency snippet to the new beta version.
sdk/containerservice/azure-resourcemanager-containerservice/pom.xml Sets module version to 2.62.0-beta.1 and changes Revapi execution behavior.
sdk/containerservice/azure-resourcemanager-containerservice/CHANGELOG.md Marks 2.62.0-beta.1 as dated/released (but currently without release-note content).

--add-opens com.azure.core/com.azure.core.implementation.util=ALL-UNNAMED
</javaModulesSurefireArgLine>
<revapi.skip>false</revapi.skip>
<revapi.skip>true</revapi.skip>
Comment on lines +3 to 4
## 2.62.0-beta.1 (2026-06-04)

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

weidongxu-microsoft commented Jun 4, 2026

What api-verison are you releasing for?

Make sure the tspconfig.yaml in specs repo is correct (it does not pin the wrong api-version).

@FumingZhang FumingZhang marked this pull request as draft June 4, 2026 13:57
@FumingZhang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What api-verison are you releasing for?

Make sure the tspconfig.yaml in specs repo is correct (it does not pin the wrong api-version).

Yes, this was generated using an incorrect API version. I will update it and mark it as ready for review once it has been regenerated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants