populace-uk candidate (for UK data controller review)#28
Open
MaxGhenis wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
populace-uk-2023-72aeefc-20260611 (PRIVATE repo, UKDS licence): beats the enhanced FRS 6/6 rotations on the sound comparison (holdout 0.31-0.60 vs 0.40-0.65 at matched 53,508), parity 0, exported-nonzero pass. NOT self-merged: swapping the UK certified default is the data controller's decision. Note: the manifest is the populace build schema, not yet the usdata release-manifest schema the generator consumes — conversion accompanies the sign-off.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stages populace-uk as a candidate UK data release — deliberately left for @nikhilwoodruff's sign-off (UK data controller; swapping the UK certified default is not a solo call).
The release (
populace-uk-2023-72aeefc-20260611, private repo under UK Data Service licence, same split as policyengine-uk-data-private):Caveats stated plainly: the income-tax (£353B) and UC (£21.8B) aggregates differ from my HMRC/DWP outturn anchors — the registry fits within 10%, so the target definitions likely differ from those anchors, but that reconciliation should be part of review. The pinned manifest uses the populace build schema; conversion to the usdata release-manifest schema accompanies sign-off.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code