-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 541
fix: replace assert(offset==0) with early return in readdir #371
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Yike-Ye
wants to merge
1
commit into
libfuse:master
Choose a base branch
from
Yike-Ye:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why assert that offset must be 0, and then handle the case where it isn't?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because previously sshfs uses
buf_get_entries(sshfs.c: 985) with offset=0, andassert(offset=0)is then used insftp_readdir_async/sftp_readdir_syncfor bug detection. In this process, all directory entries are returned from the server within one step. If the offset is non-zero, something might be wrong. See the notes in fuse.h:However, the updated MacFuse uses the new FSKit backend instead of kernel extension backend. This will sometimes deliver a non-zero
offset, and thus lead to abort and disconnection.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But won't the assert cause the code to bail on a non-zero offset? Do you perhaps want to #ifdef the assert so it isn't active on macOS?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have replaced the
assert(offset == 0)withif (offset !=0) return 0, which will return early instead of aborting the sshfs process. Although this may affect the FSKit backend behavior I mentioned, it works well for me so far. By the way, the#ifdefflag suggestion is a good point. I will update the PR shortly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I got what you meant in the beginning. There was a typo and have been fixed in the update =)